by Dennis Mannu
healthday reporter

WEDNESDAY, July 28, 2021 ( Information) — Don’t feel anything you examine about cancer and most cancers on social media. most cancers treatment.

A new examine finds that a third of the most well known content articles on social media about widespread cancer treatments comprise misinformation — and substantially of it can be downright hazardous.

“The worst-case scenario is when it rejects tested most cancers remedies in favor of a therapy that has not been revealed to efficiently treat most cancers,” stated analyze creator Dr. Skyler Johnson. “These inherent threats compromise our skill as oncologists to take care of most cancers, make improvements to survival, or at least improve and make improvements to excellent of daily life.”

For illustration, consider these fraudulent claims: “chemotherapy is ineffective for the treatment of cancer,” or “cannabis cure lung most cancers,” Or “prostate cancer can be corrected by Baking soda

The analyze identified that posts with this kind of misinformation get additional clicks and engagement than content centered on facts.

And these misinformation can consequence in delays in appropriate most cancers screening, analysis and treatment, explained Johnson, a doctor-scientist at the Huntsman Most cancers Institute at the College of Utah.

His crew discovered the 200 most well-known articles about breast, lung, prostate and colon most cancers on Facebook, Reddit, Twitter and Pinterest in between January 2018 and December 2019. The put up was reviewed for precision by specialists from the National Complete Most cancers Network.

Of the 200 articles or blog posts, about 33% contained misinformation. Of these, somewhere around 77% had info that could negatively influence therapy outcomes. The research shows that there ended up many clicks, likes and reviews on Fb.

Most of the hazardous content originated from new age internet websites, not respected information resources, but Johnson claimed it can be challenging to tell the distinction.

“Be knowledgeable that most facts requires to be evaluated critically, as there is a opportunity that what you are examining is inaccurate or potentially unsafe,” Johnson reported. “Explore your queries with your oncologist and function together as a team to appear up with a remedy program that fulfills your objectives.”

Heading forward, Johnson wants to identify misinformation and damage predictors on social media to assistance sufferers and medical practitioners greater navigate this Wild West.

The findings have been not long ago revealed Journal of the Nationwide Cancer Institute.

Regrettably, the wave of misinformation on the web has led to Dr. S. That comes as no shock to Vincent Prince, who reviewed the study’s results.

He additional that this does not imply that social media does not have just about anything constructive to supply people today living with most cancers.

“Social media websites can offer you social support or strategies to offer with the side consequences of cancer therapy,” mentioned Rajkumar, who is also the editor in chief. blood most cancers journal. “For clinical assistance, even so, it is usually much better to count on your medical professional, an tutorial middle, or a authorities business these kinds of as the Nationwide Institutes of Well being.”

more information and facts

American Cancer Society implies Browsing on the web for information and facts about cancer.

Resources: Skyler Johnson, MD, physician-scientist, Huntsman Cancer Institute, and assistant professor, radiation oncology, College of Utah, Salt Lake City S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, professor, medication, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, July 22, 2021